Skip to main content

Measuring Disinterest

One of the side effects of being a founder is that you get a lot of unsolicited and solicited pitches from potential parts, employees, investors, suppliers, business service providers (mostly recruiters), and generally a lot of people interested in leveraging your corporate assets and taking your money (and time).

Part of the growth process of our company is to assign someone to look these suitors over to make sure you find the diamond in the rough, and weed out the marginal or insane opportunities that can drain precious business time.

Peter Rip, whose blog I read often has a great summary of the value of time for a start up:

"It often feels like the scarcest resource in a startup is money. It is not. Time is scarcer. You can raise more money, but you cannot raise more time."

So while a colleague and I sat in an unusually mind numbing preso of how a potential partner could use our sales team and customer base as a “co-marketing” opportunity I day dreamed about a device that could measure my lack of interest in these types of presos. Here is what I came up with: The DODI (trademark pending widespread viral adoption).

DODI is an acronym for the “Depth of Disinterest” machine that calculates the message receiver’s interest to a specific input.

DODI has almost one person month of development but works for almost anyone at a 100% accuracy rate. Also it is pervasive, persuasive and free. In fact it is common vernacular in our company now we here a phrase like;

“Where was it on the DODI scale?”

Now the DODI scale also has almost a person month of development and works as follows;

A person receives input on a business opportunity. Their internal DODI-ometer calculates a score for the message. The lower the score the more interested the receiving party is in the message. The DODI scoring system is like golf scores; the lower the score the better. In the 1.0 release of DODI the scale was only 0 – 10. Now some folks’ DODI will go below 0 as I released a patch and some bug fixes for DODI 1.3.5.7.9 but DODI will never go over the theoretical limit of 10 when calculating disinterest.

A score of 0 or less means the message is received, understood and is worth exploring.


The DODI scale tops out at 10 (ten) where a score of 10 means the machine cannot actually compute the depth of the receiver’s disinterest in that message. In other words, the time spent receiving the message is gone and returned a value of zero to the company.

Add DODI to your business toolbox.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

BOP, MOP and Stop Negotiations

One of the clients I worked with wanted a refresher course on negotiation. And not the full page ad like you see in the airline magazines next to the ad for; “even cheaper and just as effective” noise cancelling headphones. They specifically asked for a catchy outline that sales people can even remember. So I negotiated a fee and introduced them to the BOP, MOP and STOP method. Now I am not a negotiating expert but have negotiated comprehensive agreements with HP, Boeing, Intel, Fannie Mae, Lockheed Martin, etc. So I get it. Here is the mindset I proffered to be taken into every negotiation; BOP; is defined as the Best Outcome Possible, highest price paid for the product/service one can conceive to be realistic under perfect circumstances. MOP; is the Minimal Outcome Possible or the lowest price you will accept for your product and service in a negotiated agreement. STOP; is any number below MOP that is unacceptable value and you walk away from the negotiation. Now I purposefully omitt...

Death of a Sales Team, One by One

While participating in a rather tedious discussion of the sales team effectiveness, well in this case its ineffectiveness, I heard the following; “They (meaning any sales person on the team) can just call on their contact network while we ramp lead gen.” Yikes. While the words stung my ex-sales person ears I thought there has to be an “ism” for this start up phenomena. That is a start up hires a salesperson who has a strong Rolodex and expects them to generate business from this Rolodex as a means to ramp to quota while the company gets its marketing house in order. The inevitable end result is the salesperson exhausts his or her contact database and ends up on a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) and then is let go for under achieving. Then it hit me; Rolodeath. This is the “ism” I am looking for to describe this group think outcome. Imminent death for a salesperson occurs by allowing them to exhaust their personal network with no real lead gen in sight. Anyone? Buehler?

The Weekly Sales Call Part II

Okay I have to come clean after being called out by an alert reader. I left out two events unique to myself at a sales kickoff. So in the interest of surfacing repressed memories here goes; I spilled a bottle of Corona on the wife of the then CEO soaking her whomptillion dollar silk shawl. The upside of this was she handled this with grace and aplomb and I was not fired. The CEO did joke after she got back from cleaning up, “So what did you do after you worked at (withheld) ?” Second was during the sales award ceremony I was called up as one of the top 3 reps (I was #3 out of 150) to receive my award. This company was bit different as there were many more (about 2 to 1) saleswomen then men. The VP of WW Operations was taking a wide interpretation of the obligatory handshake and kissing all the women on the cheek. So when I accepted my award, yes, I planted one on his cheek. That got the crowd going. The net result? I was promoted. Also the CEO would send me notes via internal company m...