Skip to main content

Measuring Disinterest

One of the side effects of being a founder is that you get a lot of unsolicited and solicited pitches from potential parts, employees, investors, suppliers, business service providers (mostly recruiters), and generally a lot of people interested in leveraging your corporate assets and taking your money (and time).

Part of the growth process of our company is to assign someone to look these suitors over to make sure you find the diamond in the rough, and weed out the marginal or insane opportunities that can drain precious business time.

Peter Rip, whose blog I read often has a great summary of the value of time for a start up:

"It often feels like the scarcest resource in a startup is money. It is not. Time is scarcer. You can raise more money, but you cannot raise more time."

So while a colleague and I sat in an unusually mind numbing preso of how a potential partner could use our sales team and customer base as a “co-marketing” opportunity I day dreamed about a device that could measure my lack of interest in these types of presos. Here is what I came up with: The DODI (trademark pending widespread viral adoption).

DODI is an acronym for the “Depth of Disinterest” machine that calculates the message receiver’s interest to a specific input.

DODI has almost one person month of development but works for almost anyone at a 100% accuracy rate. Also it is pervasive, persuasive and free. In fact it is common vernacular in our company now we here a phrase like;

“Where was it on the DODI scale?”

Now the DODI scale also has almost a person month of development and works as follows;

A person receives input on a business opportunity. Their internal DODI-ometer calculates a score for the message. The lower the score the more interested the receiving party is in the message. The DODI scoring system is like golf scores; the lower the score the better. In the 1.0 release of DODI the scale was only 0 – 10. Now some folks’ DODI will go below 0 as I released a patch and some bug fixes for DODI 1.3.5.7.9 but DODI will never go over the theoretical limit of 10 when calculating disinterest.

A score of 0 or less means the message is received, understood and is worth exploring.


The DODI scale tops out at 10 (ten) where a score of 10 means the machine cannot actually compute the depth of the receiver’s disinterest in that message. In other words, the time spent receiving the message is gone and returned a value of zero to the company.

Add DODI to your business toolbox.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

“Girls like guys with skills.” - Napoleon Dynamite

Truer words one will most likely never hear. Girls like guys with skills. All types of skills. Since the Agents are reaching the age where the opposite sex is becoming interesting I decided to give them some skills, and bragging rights with an overnight backpacking trip. So the Supreme Commander set up a trip in the Cascades in Washington. It was to be an overnight survival skills building trip. As I explained it, “Agents, after this trip you will make Bear Grylls look like a hand model.” Agent Hotkoffee used another word involving hand to describe the Bear, again this is a family blog. Agent Hofkoffee thought it was a great idea and she volunteered to assist with the training. Since she is more than qualified I asked her along. Figured I needed it in case the agents went off the rails. Okay, more like when the agents go off the rails. The trip was scheduled for one night in the woods off Boulder Creek Trail in the Darrington National Forest. The hike into the campsite is a moderate hi...

Yosemite’s Most Passive Aggressive Couple

This is true. On a road trip back from Colorado with my brother who I will call; my brother, we had planned stops in Zion National Park, Tehachapi CA, lunch in Fresno, and Yosemite. I will skip the initial portion of the road trip and move right to the arrival at Yosemite. This is in the late February 2008. The skies were angry that day my friends. Actually we had missed the big snow the week before and were entering Yosemite from the Highway 41 side as it winds, and it does wind, its way to Yosemite. The staff at the park’s entrance was it usual proud self but they look was a bit different. The winter staff had a visual edge to them, almost a Sci-Fi channel original movie look. Not undead, but not Fit TV either. Anyhow I digress. After a quick awkward howdy and, “Hey is the park beautiful this time of year?” type banter we checked out the Sequoia grove hike and it was too late in the day to muster the two mile hike in the snow to see the giants of the cellulose world. So we pulled out...

Pigeon-holing the Team

For lack of better phraseology pigeon-holing is the process whereby incoming executives, and employees are automatically placed into skill set buckets based on what their perceived role has been in the company. Newly hired executives quickly place personnel in functional buckets to more quickly define roles and responsibilities as they move their preferred players into roles throughout the organization. This has a two pronged effect. First it is easy for the new executives to pigeon–hole existing employees as a time saver to move their quickly to their agenda. By tagging an employee with a “sales guy” or an “operational guy” label the employees can then be rapidly slotted into the new organization. This allows for the quickest implementation of the new model and clears the transition path for the newly hired executive employees. So all of our employees get secretly (or in some cases not so secretly) voted into pigeon-holes to allow new execs to set a foundation organizational hierarchy...