Skip to main content

Measuring Disinterest

One of the side effects of being a founder is that you get a lot of unsolicited and solicited pitches from potential parts, employees, investors, suppliers, business service providers (mostly recruiters), and generally a lot of people interested in leveraging your corporate assets and taking your money (and time).

Part of the growth process of our company is to assign someone to look these suitors over to make sure you find the diamond in the rough, and weed out the marginal or insane opportunities that can drain precious business time.

Peter Rip, whose blog I read often has a great summary of the value of time for a start up:

"It often feels like the scarcest resource in a startup is money. It is not. Time is scarcer. You can raise more money, but you cannot raise more time."

So while a colleague and I sat in an unusually mind numbing preso of how a potential partner could use our sales team and customer base as a “co-marketing” opportunity I day dreamed about a device that could measure my lack of interest in these types of presos. Here is what I came up with: The DODI (trademark pending widespread viral adoption).

DODI is an acronym for the “Depth of Disinterest” machine that calculates the message receiver’s interest to a specific input.

DODI has almost one person month of development but works for almost anyone at a 100% accuracy rate. Also it is pervasive, persuasive and free. In fact it is common vernacular in our company now we here a phrase like;

“Where was it on the DODI scale?”

Now the DODI scale also has almost a person month of development and works as follows;

A person receives input on a business opportunity. Their internal DODI-ometer calculates a score for the message. The lower the score the more interested the receiving party is in the message. The DODI scoring system is like golf scores; the lower the score the better. In the 1.0 release of DODI the scale was only 0 – 10. Now some folks’ DODI will go below 0 as I released a patch and some bug fixes for DODI 1.3.5.7.9 but DODI will never go over the theoretical limit of 10 when calculating disinterest.

A score of 0 or less means the message is received, understood and is worth exploring.


The DODI scale tops out at 10 (ten) where a score of 10 means the machine cannot actually compute the depth of the receiver’s disinterest in that message. In other words, the time spent receiving the message is gone and returned a value of zero to the company.

Add DODI to your business toolbox.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Details are the Devil

Nice turn of phrase and very appropriate for a client I am working with. The client is growing; in fact it is growing so fast it has decided to implement process to handle the growth. The process is so detailed that it is actually slowing growth and in some areas, forcing a decline in growth. So I was asked why. The why was very straightforward to discover. You have a sub-$10M company implementing the same process as a $3B company. Not only is the process decisioneered beyond rational thought, it is so complex that asking a single person to manage it is crippling. For example; When a company sells a product that adds onto or works with another product, infrastructure, or application the process should reflect the “aftermarket” nature of this business. Look at Home Depot. They do not sell houses, but they sell about every aftermarket part and piece for homes (and outside the home) you can imagine. And they make no bones about it. One does not go to home depot to re-engineer their house ...

Death of a Sales Team, One by One

While participating in a rather tedious discussion of the sales team effectiveness, well in this case its ineffectiveness, I heard the following; “They (meaning any sales person on the team) can just call on their contact network while we ramp lead gen.” Yikes. While the words stung my ex-sales person ears I thought there has to be an “ism” for this start up phenomena. That is a start up hires a salesperson who has a strong Rolodex and expects them to generate business from this Rolodex as a means to ramp to quota while the company gets its marketing house in order. The inevitable end result is the salesperson exhausts his or her contact database and ends up on a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) and then is let go for under achieving. Then it hit me; Rolodeath. This is the “ism” I am looking for to describe this group think outcome. Imminent death for a salesperson occurs by allowing them to exhaust their personal network with no real lead gen in sight. Anyone? Buehler?

Masterebate

This is the second time. Fool me once shame on me, fool me twice I am a pathetic loser like Harry in D&D. Now I am not one of the silicon valley intellectual, financial, and cultural elite. How do I know this? Because they stopped calling me back. Yup moved on to the next level and here I sit in the baby pool awash with other people’s… Apologies that one got away from me. That is another post entirely. So here I sit looking for the following items because Canon will graciously: “…(might) may be able to resubmit your request for processing if you are able to provide copies of your submission information. If you have retained a copy of your disclaimer page in lieu of the UPC, you may fax them to the number at the end of this email, or mail them to us at: Mailing address: Canada: Customer Service Department PO Box 979 Fonthill, ON L0S 1E0 USA: Customer Service Department PO Box 52901 Phoenix, AZ 85072 If you wish, you can also send your documents via email as a...