Skip to main content

Measuring Disinterest

One of the side effects of being a founder is that you get a lot of unsolicited and solicited pitches from potential parts, employees, investors, suppliers, business service providers (mostly recruiters), and generally a lot of people interested in leveraging your corporate assets and taking your money (and time).

Part of the growth process of our company is to assign someone to look these suitors over to make sure you find the diamond in the rough, and weed out the marginal or insane opportunities that can drain precious business time.

Peter Rip, whose blog I read often has a great summary of the value of time for a start up:

"It often feels like the scarcest resource in a startup is money. It is not. Time is scarcer. You can raise more money, but you cannot raise more time."

So while a colleague and I sat in an unusually mind numbing preso of how a potential partner could use our sales team and customer base as a “co-marketing” opportunity I day dreamed about a device that could measure my lack of interest in these types of presos. Here is what I came up with: The DODI (trademark pending widespread viral adoption).

DODI is an acronym for the “Depth of Disinterest” machine that calculates the message receiver’s interest to a specific input.

DODI has almost one person month of development but works for almost anyone at a 100% accuracy rate. Also it is pervasive, persuasive and free. In fact it is common vernacular in our company now we here a phrase like;

“Where was it on the DODI scale?”

Now the DODI scale also has almost a person month of development and works as follows;

A person receives input on a business opportunity. Their internal DODI-ometer calculates a score for the message. The lower the score the more interested the receiving party is in the message. The DODI scoring system is like golf scores; the lower the score the better. In the 1.0 release of DODI the scale was only 0 – 10. Now some folks’ DODI will go below 0 as I released a patch and some bug fixes for DODI 1.3.5.7.9 but DODI will never go over the theoretical limit of 10 when calculating disinterest.

A score of 0 or less means the message is received, understood and is worth exploring.


The DODI scale tops out at 10 (ten) where a score of 10 means the machine cannot actually compute the depth of the receiver’s disinterest in that message. In other words, the time spent receiving the message is gone and returned a value of zero to the company.

Add DODI to your business toolbox.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Details are the Devil

Nice turn of phrase and very appropriate for a client I am working with. The client is growing; in fact it is growing so fast it has decided to implement process to handle the growth. The process is so detailed that it is actually slowing growth and in some areas, forcing a decline in growth. So I was asked why. The why was very straightforward to discover. You have a sub-$10M company implementing the same process as a $3B company. Not only is the process decisioneered beyond rational thought, it is so complex that asking a single person to manage it is crippling. For example; When a company sells a product that adds onto or works with another product, infrastructure, or application the process should reflect the “aftermarket” nature of this business. Look at Home Depot. They do not sell houses, but they sell about every aftermarket part and piece for homes (and outside the home) you can imagine. And they make no bones about it. One does not go to home depot to re-engineer their house ...

My Dad is Old School

Really old school. In fact he defines the last great generation of people who suffered in silence, SSRI inhibitor free, and aspirin is for whimps generation. Drug a kid in school to get him to pay attention? He will have none of that. Sit them down, tie them to the chair (alas no duct tape in his youth). He is proud, hard working and is a lifelong Republican because "those liberals will ruin the country." He says a friend who knows a key operative in the party has proof in the form of photos that Hillary is a lesbian. He also thinks Bill Clinton has super powers that make women take off their clothes which is damnable. So he hates him. However this year he says he will vote for Obama because GWB has "redefined the worst parts of our party and the next generation will suffer." We will see, my take is he will say one thing and do another (vote the party line). As the baby boomer generation gets up there in years our parents begin to slide into what I call the medical...

BOP, MOP and Stop Negotiations

One of the clients I worked with wanted a refresher course on negotiation. And not the full page ad like you see in the airline magazines next to the ad for; “even cheaper and just as effective” noise cancelling headphones. They specifically asked for a catchy outline that sales people can even remember. So I negotiated a fee and introduced them to the BOP, MOP and STOP method. Now I am not a negotiating expert but have negotiated comprehensive agreements with HP, Boeing, Intel, Fannie Mae, Lockheed Martin, etc. So I get it. Here is the mindset I proffered to be taken into every negotiation; BOP; is defined as the Best Outcome Possible, highest price paid for the product/service one can conceive to be realistic under perfect circumstances. MOP; is the Minimal Outcome Possible or the lowest price you will accept for your product and service in a negotiated agreement. STOP; is any number below MOP that is unacceptable value and you walk away from the negotiation. Now I purposefully omitt...