Skip to main content

How to Have an Effective C-Level Preso

This is rich. I was asked to provide a client with a presentation on how to give a presentation to C-Level executives, seriously. Talk about slippery slope. What to say that not only meets the literal structure of a good preso, and what literal structure to follow?

The always relevant, who, what, when, where, why and how?

The always riveting ACE presentation structure?

The marketing framework of; what we are (insert value prop/startling statement here)? Who needs this? Our product does “X” unlike the competition who obviously cannot do “X” as well as us. Which means to you…?

Nope, skip them all and go to the source. C-Level people who are pitched more than Larry Ellison’s yacht during a
Pisco sour infused, Sydney to Hobart run. That is right I asked the big wigs, the top guns, the man (women) the HMFIC, the buck stops here (it does not by BTW), the subpoenaed, Sarbanes Oxley-ed to death, board managing, decision making, house remodeling, globe-trotting, nothing like you and me crowd. I figured they have heard it all and they all have a good yarn or two on being pitched and what works and what does not. Couple of important points; C-Level persuasion is as much a social exercise as a literal exercise. Two; really good C-Level execs are purposefully insulated from making a final call on any major decision as it is not only prudent, it gives them plausible deniability if the decision turns out to be a real stinker, for whatever reason. Okay how to do it.

Rule number one; “For fuck’s sake do your homework.” Yes that is a quote from a C-Level executive. Seems the best paid, most influential people actually like to talk about what is relevant in their world. Get this, one CEO told me about 90% of the people who contact him have no idea what is on his plate. But by (deity of choice here) they are going to pitch to the man (woman) anyway. That is fast track to the C-Level “Do Not Answer This Call” list. Almost all of them suggested vetting your pitch with their “people.” This is the reason they have people. If you cannot, say, get past the admin by winning him or her over, forget it. The obstacles are there for a reason. Too much access and the CEO will lose his most precious resource; time. So study, read, use one of the internets. Talk to people in the target organization and come prepared.

Rule Number Two; have something interesting to say. To a person these folks cannot express their disinterest on how a competitor used your crap to resolve an issue. In fact they hate that. Now, they do care that someone they know well, or have a business relationship with has used it successfully. In fact when I talked to one C-Level exec and mentioned I finished a call with another, I was instantly “in the club.” Remember C-Level folks spend a great deal of time avoiding irrelevant, uninteresting, half assed, half baked, “next best thing,” game changing, performance enhancing pitches to buy stuff every single waking hour of their life. And it is a 24X7 assault as one C-Level exec told me. So be interesting, it is a lot harder than you think, because C-Level people do not think like you and by the transitive property of who you think you are, don’t really fuggen’ care what you think. They do care a great deal about what their peers think.

Rule Number Three; tell a story. In fact the C-Level people I spoke with (live or email) said a story that falls in line with their goals and objectives is much easier to follow then a bunch of bullet points on some project that increased X by implementing Y through Z money. One C-Level exec even told me a story about why he does not talk to people like me about how to pitch to him, but that is for another post. A CTO told me story about a creative approach a person used to reach him, he liked the fact the person took the time to research, laid out a good story on why they should talk, and then told a solid story to him on how it may impact his initiatives. SO I guess Rule Number Three can be boiled down to make sure not pitch, and focus on informing and being engaging.

Rule Number Four; know your audience. This could be rule 1-3 but came up as a separate rule after I realized I needed more stratification in my blog post. What this means is the cardinal rule of C-Level communication is, now focus; DO NOT WASTE THEIR TIME. BTW you will know you are wasting their time if you get cut off in mid sentence, or hear a phrase like, “How did you get this number?” Several C-Level folks said that they are very much a one shot opportunity. By this they explained that if you catch them at the right time with the right story they will be “open for business” on the topic. If they are not they may be closed. So in that case on e C-Level exec said, “Be sure to be brief, be bright and be gone. If you respect my time I will respect you.”

Oh, and a bunch of stuff on how sales people do not “get it” and there remodel is dragging on, they have thing and cannot talk, I need to talk to this guy and “How did you get this number?”
Rule Five; do not ask for their opinion, or more fatally do not ask them to do something. Remember they have people. Ask for the person who does whatever you need done so they can do it for the C-Level exec.

In sum, this takes practice, I am fortunate as I was born without much self-awareness so I could blindly iterate to effectiveness without feeling shame. Trust me if you are well read, are brief, bright and gone, you will be fine.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

When the Details are the Devil

Nice turn of phrase and very appropriate for a client I am working with. The client is growing; in fact it is growing so fast it has decided to implement process to handle the growth. The process is so detailed that it is actually slowing growth and in some areas, forcing a decline in growth. So I was asked why. The why was very straightforward to discover. You have a sub-$10M company implementing the same process as a $3B company. Not only is the process decisioneered beyond rational thought, it is so complex that asking a single person to manage it is crippling. For example; When a company sells a product that adds onto or works with another product, infrastructure, or application the process should reflect the “aftermarket” nature of this business. Look at Home Depot. They do not sell houses, but they sell about every aftermarket part and piece for homes (and outside the home) you can imagine. And they make no bones about it. One does not go to home depot to re-engineer their house ...

Death of a Sales Team, One by One

While participating in a rather tedious discussion of the sales team effectiveness, well in this case its ineffectiveness, I heard the following; “They (meaning any sales person on the team) can just call on their contact network while we ramp lead gen.” Yikes. While the words stung my ex-sales person ears I thought there has to be an “ism” for this start up phenomena. That is a start up hires a salesperson who has a strong Rolodex and expects them to generate business from this Rolodex as a means to ramp to quota while the company gets its marketing house in order. The inevitable end result is the salesperson exhausts his or her contact database and ends up on a PIP (Performance Improvement Plan) and then is let go for under achieving. Then it hit me; Rolodeath. This is the “ism” I am looking for to describe this group think outcome. Imminent death for a salesperson occurs by allowing them to exhaust their personal network with no real lead gen in sight. Anyone? Buehler?

Masterebate

This is the second time. Fool me once shame on me, fool me twice I am a pathetic loser like Harry in D&D. Now I am not one of the silicon valley intellectual, financial, and cultural elite. How do I know this? Because they stopped calling me back. Yup moved on to the next level and here I sit in the baby pool awash with other people’s… Apologies that one got away from me. That is another post entirely. So here I sit looking for the following items because Canon will graciously: “…(might) may be able to resubmit your request for processing if you are able to provide copies of your submission information. If you have retained a copy of your disclaimer page in lieu of the UPC, you may fax them to the number at the end of this email, or mail them to us at: Mailing address: Canada: Customer Service Department PO Box 979 Fonthill, ON L0S 1E0 USA: Customer Service Department PO Box 52901 Phoenix, AZ 85072 If you wish, you can also send your documents via email as a...